|
Debate Rubric
Page history
last edited
by David Shutkin 9 years, 4 months ago
Class Debate : The Great FYS Surveillance Debate
|
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Respect for Other Team
|
All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and were in appropriate language.
|
Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not.
|
Most statements and responses were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark.
|
Statements, responses and/or body language were consistently not respectful.
|
Use of Facts/Statistics
|
Every major point was documented with a source and well supported with several relevant facts, statistics, and/or examples.
|
Every major point was documented with a source and adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.
|
Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance and/or source documentation of some were questionable.
|
Not every major point was documented and/or supported.
|
Rebuttal
|
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong.
|
Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong.
|
Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak.
|
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant
|
Organization
|
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion.
|
Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion.
|
All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical.
|
Arguments were not clearly tied to an idea (premise).
|
Debate Rubric
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.